|
|
| |
| |
|
Theology of Atonement and Paul's Vision of Christianity (Michael Glazier Books)
|
|
|
Average Rating:  out of 2 Reviews
|
Price: $7.95
|
|
Sale: $5.00
|
| |
|
Manufacturer: Liturgical Pr
|
|
EAN (European Article Number): 9780814656792
|
| |
|
|
|
Binding: Paperback
|
|
Author: Anthony Tambasco
|
|
Publisher: Liturgical Pr
|
|
Dewey Decimal Number: 232.3
|
|
Publication Date: 1991-07
|
|
Reading Level: 104
|
|
|
| |
|
Description: Tambasco claims that we have misunderstood the atonement of Christ since Anselm. Tambasco claims that the Apostle Paul, for instance, maintained no concept of laying the sins of one (man) to the account of Another (Christ). Tambasco claims we have, for centuries, only "misunderstood" that Jesus died to pay for our sins as a reconciliation between God and man. Jesus Himself understood His atoning sacrifice as payment for our individual sins. Just for starters (and in addition to the Hebrew Scripture precendent of sacrifice), we have Isaiah 53:5, Matthew 20:28, Matthew 26:27-28, Mark 10:45, John 1:29, John 19:30 (wherein "tetelestai" mean that payment was rendered in full), Acts 20:28, Romans 3:23-25, Romans 5:9, 1 Corinthians 15:1-4, 1 Corinthians 6:19-20, I Corinthians 15:2-4, II Corinthians 5:14, II Corinthians 5:18-19, Galatians 3:13, Ephesians 1:7, Hebrews 9:11-15, Hebrews 9:26, Hebrews 10:10, 1 Timothy 2:5-6, 1 Peter 1:18-19, 1 Peter 2:24, 1 Peter 3:18, 1 John 4:10, and 1 John 2:2 speaking against Tambasco's attempt at theological sexiness. It is no wonder that he appears on reading lists with authors like Crossan, Borg, and Funk, all of the pseudo-academic, soundly discounted Jesus Seminar. Anselm did not create the modern notion of atonement. Rather, he publicized biblical principle. Christ, the perfect expression of God's love for man, willingly died as payment for sins. He was and is the perfect reconciliation between God's justice and mercy.
|
| |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Customer Reviews
|
| |
|
Review Summary: a profound and reverant study |
Date: 2002-06-07 |
|
| |
|
Details: in a brief book (114pp), anthony tambasco has taken another look at saint paul's concept of atonement. you may or may not agree with the conclusions that the author reaches (who ever agrees with everything in any book), but you gain from the author's insights. unless you force the bible to mean what your religion teaches, rather than humbly study the bible for what the bible has to say. |
| |
|
Review Summary: Heresy |
Date: 2000-04-16 |
|
| |
|
Details: Tambasco claims that we have misunderstood the atonement of Christ since Anselm. Tambasco claims that the Apostle Paul, for instance, maintained no concept of laying the sins of one (man) to the account of Another (Christ). Tambasco claims we have, for centuries, only "misunderstood" that Jesus died to pay for our sins as a reconciliation between God and man. Jesus Himself understood His atoning sacrifice as payment for our individual sins. Just for starters (and in addition to the Hebrew Scripture precendent of sacrifice), we have Isaiah 53:5, Matthew 20:28, Matthew 26:27-28, Mark 10:45, John 1:29, John 19:30 (wherein "tetelestai" mean that payment was rendered in full), Acts 20:28, Romans 3:23-25, Romans 5:9, 1 Corinthians 15:1-4, 1 Corinthians 6:19-20, I Corinthians 15:2-4, II Corinthians 5:14, II Corinthians 5:18-19, Galatians 3:13, Ephesians 1:7, Hebrews 9:11-15, Hebrews 9:26, Hebrews 10:10, 1 Timothy 2:5-6, 1 Peter 1:18-19, 1 Peter 2:24, 1 Peter 3:18, 1 John 4:10, and 1 John 2:2 speaking against Tambasco's attempt at theological sexiness. It is no wonder that he appears on reading lists with authors like Crossan, Borg, and Funk, all of the pseudo-academic, soundly discounted Jesus Seminar. Anselm did not create the modern notion of atonement. Rather, he publicized biblical principle. Christ, the perfect expression of God's love for man, willingly died as payment for sins. He was and is the perfect reconciliation between God's justice and mercy. |
| |
|
| |
Similar Products
|
|
|
| |
This Product is similar to and may be found in the Following Categories:
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
