SHOPPING HOME
      >  The Books Store   >  Science   >  Biological Sciences   >  Ecology   >  Animal Ecology   <<<   YOU ARE HERE

Shopper's Delight

The Books Store
The Scars Of Evolution


Image: Shopper's Delight: Animal Ecology in The Books Store ~ The Scars Of Evolution
 
 

The Scars of Evolution

 
 
Average Rating:    out of 22 Reviews
Price: $26.95
Sale: $26.68
 
Manufacturer: Souvenir Press Ltd
EAN (European Article Number): 9780285629967
Number of Items: 1
 
 
Binding: Paperback
Author: Elaine Morgan
Publisher: Souvenir Press Ltd
Dewey Decimal Number: 239
Publication Date: 2000-09-05
Reading Level: 212
 
 
Description: When Elaine Morgan wrote The Descent of Woman in 1972, it sent shock waves around the world, and is now widely regarded as a key work on human evolution, and essential to any discussion of women's place in society. Now, with The Scars of Evolution, Morgan offers a pioneering look just where it was our earliest ancestors came from, and the legacy--not always advantageous--that they left us. As she sets out to solve one of the enduring riddles of our origins--to discover the evolutionary path that separated us from the rest of the animals--Morgan shows that many of the theories currently accepted by scientists cannot explain our unique features: they leave too many questions unanswered.

Millions of years ago, something happened to our ape ancestors that did not happen to the forebears of gorillas and chimpanzees, something that made them walk on two legs, lose their fur, sweat, develop larger brains, and learn to speak. While scientists have visited many a dig and studied many a fossil for clues, Elaine Morgan argues that all of the facts about our mysterious origins are right in front of us--in the form of fundamental flaws in the human design. Our propensity to suffer from lower back pain, obesity, varicose veins, acne, even infant death syndrome, is essentially the result of a cataclysmic event in our distant past.

Scientists have long observed that our spines were not made for upright walking. Yet natural selection--the basic tenet of evolutionary theory--dictates that enduring changes to a species occur because of the need to adapt to changes in the environment. While thousands of working hours are lost each year to "bad backs," at some point long ago it must have been an advantage to walk on two legs. The most common theory is that we became bipedal while hunting on the African savannah, needing our arms free for weapons, using an upright stance to see enemies from afar. But as Morgan points out, animals need more speed on the savannah, both for pursuit and flight, than two legs can offer. Her explanation: bipedalism emerged from life in an aquatic environment due to the flooding of the African rift valley millenia ago. The apes that suddenly found themselves stranded in swamp land (a swamp that remained for thousands of years) had to walk upright to keep from drowning. The human tendency toward obesity was once not an unsightly health problem, but rather a lifesaving form of insulation, one present in all aquatic mammals. And as Morgan carefully considers all of our other uniquely human traits--our relative hairlessness, our ability to control our breathing, our inability to maintain proper salt levels--a compelling case emerges for our human origins in a watery environment.

Lively, controversial, and presented with a brilliant logic, The Scars of Evolution will change the way you think about the world--and our place in it.

 
order Shopper's Delight: Animal Ecology in The Books Store ~ The Scars Of Evolution
 
 
 
 

Customer Reviews
 
Worst Reviews Latest Reviews Best Reviews
 
Review Summary: Time will tell... Date: 2008-06-29
 
Details: Interesting ideas. I'm not totally sold on Morgan's theories. I do think as our meathods of science become more advanced we will get closer to solving the mystery. I would still reccomend this book however. Morgan does seem to know her stuff.
 
Review Summary: Exciting and Convincing Date: 2007-12-31
 
Details: I have read both this book and the "Aquatic Ape Hypothesis" volume. Both are worth reading but I find the present book more convincing due to the number and quality of the evidence that are marshaled in support of the stated hypothesis; a prolonged aquatic phase in human evolution.

I found the book's arguments and evidence in support of the hypothesis convincing but I am not an expert in physical anthropology and related sciences. I agree with the author that the aquatic ape hypothesis provides a more robust framework for the observed data than the savannah theory.

I highly recommend this book.
 
Review Summary: Why Isn't This Theory Taught in Schools? Date: 2006-07-20
 
Details: When I was in tenth grade, I went to a science summer camp in Maine. It was there that I was introduced to the Aquatic Ape Thoery by an instructor who was given the chance to present on anything of his choosing. I was immediately fascinated, and read Morgan's book as soon as I got home. Why hadn't I heard of this theory before, and why was the savanna theory so widely accepted when there was little proof that it was true? I am now 23, and in the process of reading this wonderful book once again. I have introduced it to my good friend who is a Christian, and who has been brought up his whole life to doubt evolution. He too is finding it fasciating, and the book is answering a lot of his questions.

I studied biology in college, and have been taught to think critically when examining data and scientific theories. What I would like to know is, why is this theory not more widely known? As far as I know, it is not even presented as an option. I have heard of it from no one but that one instructor from tenth grade summercamp.

I would highly recommend The Scars of Evolution to anyone interested in human evolution, human medical issues, history, to anyone who has had doubts or questions about evolution, and to anyone who is just plain curious. Not only does this book present a fascinating subject, but it is very well written and quite readable.

 
Review Summary: a valuable contribution worth serious consideration Date: 2005-09-13
 
Details: The Aquatic Theory shaves the hair off the naked ape as neatly as Occam's razor. I have never been able to figure out why this has not replaced the far-fetched theories that academia clutches. Bipedalism evolved as a heat reducing mechanism. Oh alleluia I believe I believe! Come on, has theory totally replaced common sense? During the summer now drawing to fall, what did you do to beat the heat? "Hey, I'm hot and sweaty, I think I'll go stand at attention." For me, it was "Last one in's a rotten egg!"

I was already acquainted with the Aquatic Theory when I first read this book several years ago. It seems reasonable to me. I have written polite letters to several physical anthropologists saying that I have rarely seen this theory included in academic discussions, and have never seen a convincing refutation. I have asked them to point out the theory's fatal flaws. To date, nobody has ever replied to my queries.

If you see the Aquatic Theory mentioned in mainstream physical anthropology books, the author usually grabs her few, inconsequential weak points and avoids the weight of her arguments. One book `refuted' the theory by saying that in the water we would be prey to crocodiles. This was his entire refutation. We're safer with lions and leopards? Morgan did make a fatuous statement (not in this book), that women's breasts may have evolved so babies could cling to them. The professional anthropologists love that one! This is their favorite. You can almost hear them giggling as they trot that out, disregarding that this is not a key point in the argument.

I suspect that the main failing of the Aquatic Theory is that Morgan is not a PhD; she is intruding on sacred territory without being a member of the club. What's worse, she is female. Forget the lip service paid to women's rights, where does she get off, trying to tell the men her ideas? (FYR: I am a white heterosexual male,)

If Morgan had gotten a PhD in Comparative Shampooology from Rabbit Hash U, and published her work as E Morgan PhD, the Aquatic Theory would be as mainstream as Continental Drift is now, generations after Wegener wandered off into a snowstorm. Hang in there, Elaine!
 
Review Summary: Learning other things about human evolution Date: 2005-08-18
 
Details: Somebody way down below calls this conjecture. I believe that conjecture, with a bit of evidence and an overall sense of coherence and matching with known facts amounts to what's known as THEORY.

There's a lot of revolutionary activity out there in the sciences and humanities because a lot of the conventional ideas about just about everything just aren't holding much water these days. Egyptologists, for example, confronted with a growing pile of abnormalities and inconsistencies are looking like plain old idiots. No straight-laced anthropologist seems to have anything sensible to say about the spread of humans through the so-called New World. Lynn Margulis is asking tough questions about why DNA is present in places where it shouldn't be and the establishment is clucking like chickens. An astronomer from the Naval Observatory named Van Flandern thinks he has terrific evidence (orbital equations and such) indicating a planet just flat out blew up years ago and he's treated like some kook. Charles Hapgood, too many years ago, found old maps that pre-dated Columbus showing the New World and Antarctica--some of them are more accurate than maps of Columbus's time--and he's still a fringe character. One old map of Antarctica shows it without the ice. We didn't know what was under the ice until the 1950s and it matched this map abit too well.

Richard Ellis, in his book "Aquagenesis" talks about Elaine Morgan's work favorably. He mentions that when he confronts nearly any disapproving scientist he or she can't come up with any reasons why her theory could be wrong. Note how short the "conjecture" review is. It's always like that with these good new and radical theories, that or ad hominum arguments (I came across some of those regarding Margulis). When you have nothing well-reasoned to say, assume a haughty air and just dismiss things. That isn't a review, it's an emission of gas.

Folks, this is going to get worse, not better. With the insane emphasis on specialization currently in vogue we're raising generations of pinpoint specific scientists and thinkers--few generalists concerned with truth and the big picture and all--who will continuously be choosing between the quest for knowledge and the quest for tenure and pensions. If you've spent your entire professional career learning One Big Thing and that thing is being challenged just where does that leave you? Look at all the Harvard MBAs out there who, because they have an MBA from Harvard, can never be wrong. Look at someone like Marvin Minsky who's spent his entire career getting money and attention for saying that the human brain is simple wiring and circuits and consciousness can be designed like a car stereo system. There's plenty of evidence to the contrary (read Roger Penrose) but is Minsky ever going to change his tune and subsequently lose his cash cow? No way. This is about placement and branding too.

Elaine Morgan isn't engaged in a battle of ideas, she's engaged in a cultural and economic battle. Her rightness or wrongness was never the issue, she's rocking the boat--a boat filled with a lot of very comfortable and lazy academics who are enjoying their sabbaticals, their wine and cheese get-togethers, their affairs with students, and their ever-growing lists of publications, and really have no incentive, and plenty of negative incentive, to review any substantial new idea. They look at Elaine Morgan's work and ask, consciously or unconsciously, "What's in it for me?" or "How could I possibly advance my own career by endorsing this?" Cowards.

What is missing almost completely in the academic world is intellectual curiosity, a passion for truth and knowledge, and a sense of wonder about the world. Gone are the days of Richard Feynman types getting gaga over a new idea or a new insight. The big deal now is information and number crunching--cheaper and faster ways of doing the same old thing--and have you seen any genuinely new ideas, some dazzling synergy or intellectual leap, come from this crowd in the last few decades? Hardly. Then toss in all the Politically Correct types in the humanities--the most narrow-minded pack of dogmatists since the Inquisition. Try presenting a new spin on things with that crowd! Walk into a classroom and present evidence that differs with anything being taught in, for just one example, a modern Women's Studies course (I know a young gal who dared to disagree with her feminist prof and was nearly thrown out of the classroom). They will only accept more evidence in support of their beliefs.

 
More Reviews
 

Similar Products
 
  The Descent of Woman: The Classic Study of Evolution
 
  Aquatic Ape Hypothesis (Condor Indep Voices)
 
  The Descent of the Child: Human Evolution From a New Perspective
 
  At the Water's Edge: Fish with Fingers, Whales with Legs, and How Life Came Ashore but Then Went Back to Sea
 
  Why We Get Sick: The New Science of Darwinian Medicine
 

This Product is similar to and may be found in the Following Categories:
 
 

General Anthropology
Social Sciences Nonfiction
Subjects Books
General AAS Anthropology
Social Sciences Nonfiction
Subjects Books
General AAS Ecology
Outdoors & Nature Subjects
Books Apologetics
Theology Christianity
Religion & Spirituality Subjects
Books General
New Age Religion & Spirituality
Subjects Books
General AAS New Age
Religion & Spirituality Subjects
Books General
Religion & Spirituality Subjects
Books General AAS
Religion & Spirituality Subjects
Books General
Biology Biological Sciences
Science Subjects
Books General AAS
Biology Biological Sciences
Science Subjects
Books Animal Ecology
Ecology Biological Sciences
Science Subjects
Books General
Ecology Biological Sciences
Science Subjects
Books General AAS
Ecology Biological Sciences
Science Subjects
Books Organic
Evolution Science
Subjects Books
General Evolution
Science Subjects
Books General AAS
Evolution Science
Subjects Books
General Nature & Ecology
Science Subjects
Books General AAS
Nature & Ecology Science
Subjects Books
Paperback Mass Market
Trade Binding (binding)
Refinements Books
Printed Books Format (feature_browse-bin)
Refinements Books