 |
| |
| |
|
Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew
|
|
|
Average Rating:  out of 104 Reviews
|
Price: $19.99
|
|
Sale: $10.00
|
| |
|
Manufacturer: Oxford University Press, USA
|
|
EAN (European Article Number): 9780195182491
|
|
Number of Items: 1
|
| |
|
|
|
Binding: Paperback
|
|
Author: Bart D. Ehrman
|
|
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA
|
|
Dewey Decimal Number: 270
|
|
Publication Date: 2005-09-15
|
|
Reading Level: 320
|
|
|
| |
Description: The early Christian Church was a chaos of contending beliefs. Some groups of Christians claimed that there was not one God but two or twelve or thirty. Some believed that the world had not been created by God but by a lesser, ignorant deity. Certain sects maintained that Jesus was human but not divine, while others said he was divine but not human.
In Lost Christianities, Bart D. Ehrman offers a fascinating look at these early forms of Christianity and shows how they came to be suppressed, reformed, or forgotten. All of these groups insisted that they upheld the teachings of Jesus and his apostles, and they all possessed writings that bore out their claims, books reputedly produced by Jesus's own followers. Modern archaeological work has recovered a number of key texts, and as Ehrman shows, these spectacular discoveries reveal religious diversity that says much about the ways in which history gets written by the winners. Ehrman's discussion ranges from considerations of various "lost scriptures"--including forged gospels supposedly written by Simon Peter, Jesus's closest disciple, and Judas Thomas, Jesus's alleged twin brother--to the disparate beliefs of such groups as the Jewish-Christian Ebionites, the anti-Jewish Marcionites, and various "Gnostic" sects. Ehrman examines in depth the battles that raged between "proto-orthodox Christians"--those who eventually compiled the canonical books of the New Testament and standardized Christian belief--and the groups they denounced as heretics and ultimately overcame.
Scrupulously researched and lucidly written, Lost Christianities is an eye-opening account of politics, power, and the clash of ideas among Christians in the decades before one group came to see its views prevail.
|
| |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Customer Reviews
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
Review Summary: I wanted to like this book |
Date: 2008-11-21 |
|
| |
Details: I really wanted to like this book. The idea that there are more books out there that could have been included in the Bible is fascinating. The author, however, turns what could be a good topic for discussion into a boring thesis. I was turned off by what seemed to be the author's view that the current books of the New Testament are accurate, non-forgeries. The book then goes on to describe how the "lost" gospels appear to be real, but alas, when compared to what we have now, is not. While I don't doubt that the current gospels may be true, by presenting the others as fakes because they don't show the hallmarks of the current gospels makes me wonder if the current gospels themselves are forgeries. With this doubt in my mind, I could not take the rest of the book seriously, and couldn't finish it.
In all, if this subject interests you alot, then this may be a book for you. If you are just curious about the subject, or skeptical in any way, your best bet is to just skip this book all together.
|
| |
|
Review Summary: Gripping reading |
Date: 2008-10-19 |
|
| |
|
Details: Ehrman surprisingly manages to introduce a sensitive topic in a largely unbiased way without being offensive to the sensibilities of most Christians today. This is a very difficult accomplishment where many other authors failed before. I really appreciated his exposition, and actually learned much about the early history of Christianity and the so-called "apocryphal texts". My only grip is he tends to be repetitive in many places, to stress one point or another. |
| |
|
Review Summary: Just Awful!! |
Date: 2008-09-16 |
|
| |
|
Details: I was very interested in this book since i read the Bible every day.But i was very disapointed.The author does a very poor job in trying to make us, the readers, feel interested in his job.That is basically because i felt i was listening to a very boring lecture as i was reading this book.The basis of this book is to analyze non-canonical books to see if they can shed some light into our understanding of Christianity.But the author falls miserably because the investigation into this books are just boring and without any real importance.As the author describes passages of this non canonical books you get the feeling that this work is worthless.This non canonical books are so poor, so obviously ridicuolous that you wonder why invest time and effort in something that doesnt need discussion.In other words, why examine forgeries if you know that they are forgeries.It just didnt made sense to me.And again, the author's narrative is boring and dull.I felt like the author was telling me not to jump from a tall building because it will hurt me.Is that obvious.Just a very dull and awful book. |
| |
|
Review Summary: Good enough for its target audience |
Date: 2008-09-13 |
|
| |
Details: In my opinion, you have two kinds of lay persons (outside of students): i) Thoroughly interested dabblers who know more than most laity but aren't quite conversant enough with the material to write/speak about the subject, say in a book or during a lecture; ii) The completely uninformed (or misinformed).
As a member of the first class of laity, the scope of this book is broad enough to relay bits of information that some one like myself may not have known, and to express that information in a fairly, neatly packaged way--a decent reference, once you've read the book, to go back and check on what's taken for granted in biblical scholarship. It invites further reading for those interested in such issues. For that you have the excellent footnotes bibliography.
The second class of laity will probably be somewhat flustered. Ehrman is already somewhat of a controversial figure (personally, I think he loves that fact), but__Lost Christianities__is conservative enough not to outrage your average church-goer into believing this book came straight from the Anti-Christ's weapons cache (since it softly challenges the claims to the original faith the 'proto-orthodox' party laid, letting the reader know that the 'church' as they know it wasn't always just there since Jesus); but at the same time, not propoganize outlandish liberal theories to work against Christian orthodoxy that some average non-Christian could ignorantly run with as ammunition, thinking that he's found the skeleton key to disproving mainline Christianity.
For what it's worth, it accomplishes its purpose. And for that I give it 4 stars. |
| |
|
Review Summary: Survey of non-canonical writings from early Christianity |
Date: 2008-09-08 |
|
| |
Details: Survey of non-canonical writings from early Christianity, how they came to be, how they were used and by whom, and why they weren't included in the final form of the New Testament . The writer seems to want to make the point that many non-orthodox writings were equally deserving of inclusion, and that the final form of the New Testament was only the result of human political maneuvering. But the bizarre nature of these writings would lead the Christian to identify them as obviously non-inspired and the dispassionate observer to find them nonsensical and mythical in nature.
Perhaps the most interesting aspect of the book is the sometimes Indiana Jones-like history of how some of these "lost scriptures" came to be found by archeologists or researchers centuries after being lost. |
| |
|
| |
Similar Products
|
|
|
| |
This Product is similar to and may be found in the Following Categories:
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
